Navigation

 


Tuesday
02Feb2010

Reflections on 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell'

My fellow blogger Cobb wrote a post this morning about 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' and the comments Obama has recently made regarding its existence. The post is as follows:

The Great and Powerful Oz commands that homosexuals report front and center. You have lived in the shadows for too long and now must proudly show off your sexuality in military splendor. Why? Because we are not interested in your service, we are interested in your identity. By we, we mean the royal we. The Great and Powerful Oz has spoken. 

Disgusting.

I left a short comment that I will elaborate on here. Cobb seems to assert that Obama's stance on 'don't ask, don't tell' is insisting he doesn't value homosexuals' service, only their sexual identity. I say Obama's goal is exactly the opposite. He is trying to give people, straight or queer, the opportunity to serve our nation without being pigeon-holed by their sexual identity.

Under the current policy, if you are found to be a homosexual serving in America's military, you are discharged after your sexuality has been paraded in front of your fellow servicemen and women in a military court. This is what Obama's proclamation seeks to change. He's not seeking to change 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' to 'Ask, Tell'. He's seeking to eliminate the stigma of homosexuality from service and make the two things independent and unrelated.

If you are gay and want to serve in the military, you don't have to broadcast it to everyone, but you no longer have to walk in shadows and meet in secrecy. You no longer can be brought before a military court and discharged for being who you are.

The integration of homosexuals in the military today is reminiscent of the integration of blacks into the military in the late 1940s. Although blacks served in our nation's military long before that, just as homosexuals have, they weren't officially integrated or given equal status until Truman's Executive Order 9981.

I watched the Joint Chiefs of Staff's reactions during the President's comments. They sat stoic and austere, showing visible disdain for removing 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' from their policy books. These soldiers looked glued to their seats and shaken to their core. The very definition of uncomfortable. It's funny to me that men who are used to and welcome danger and adventure in so many arenas of their lives are so obviously scared of gay people.

I just feel sorry for gays currently serving in the military. They're in a precarious position. If they come out now and Obama's dream comes true, it's all good. But what if it doesn't? What if the military decides to keep their prejudices for a little bit longer? Will bright, young soldiers like Lt. Dan Choi be forcibly kept from serving their country? I hope this isn't the case, but it very well may be. I wish them all the best of luck in their journey and want to personally thank everyone who serves in our military, especially the gay men and women.

Monday
01Feb2010

We're All Floating In Space

Here's something that started out with something rather adorable, then turned into something tragic, then turned into something pretty awesome. Every morning that Somer and Milana, my 18 month old, wake up before me (weekdays), Milana typically takes my glasses off of my sidetable, and hands them to me so I can put them on before kissing her goodbye. Last Friday, she did this and I ignored her. The next sound was Somer exclaiming 'Oh no Milana!' Yes, after I ignored her, she went on to just play with the glasses and twist them into exciting new shapes. Tragic: she destroyed my glasses. Good: I get to buy new glasses. I got Tom Ford frames (pics as soon as they come in). I love Tom Ford, a perfect example of elegance and style to which I aspire.

A week and a half ago, I damaged my wrist re-racking a weight in Crossfit. I actually missed the left side while hitting the right, and jerked my left wrist downward in a not-so-good way. It's been a rather rough recovery time, and I got x-rays taken while I was at the doctor last Friday (I also might have high blood pressure, unfortunate genetics).

I had a few extra minutes on the way to a job interview last Wednesday, and stopped at an anime store. Nothing but anime. Fascinating. I had a chubby, 17 year old employee, most likely an outcast at her school, spend fifteen minutes explaining to me what series are for beginners, which are for experienced anime, and whatever else she could teach me in fifteen minutes. I enjoy seeing individuals so excited about anything. Other people's passions make me smile. I also have an incredible interest in subcultures, and anime is one of the biggest in existence.

I've had an idea for a book for about two years now. I finally started to do research and found that it's already been written. Well, maybe the world needs two books like this. A book about subcultures, or perhaps even microcultures. Anime would be a good choice, but perhaps it's too large a subculture. I've picked up the magazine 'Rue Morgue', which is for horror aficionados. I'm a film buff, and I haven't heard of the majority of the films in this magazine. A few of the other cultures I've considered pursuing are raves, gothics/vampires, and hackers (maybe a little too close for me to view objectively).

As for my new years resolutions, I've been working out regularly, although I couldn't go to Crossfit for a week because of my wrist injury (bummer). I've been eating extremely well, cutting out soda almost completely, and rarely eating sugar or processed foods. I'm basically following the Primal Blueprint. I'd say I'm about 75% compliant, which is actually my goal. I've written a bit more regularly, but still want to write more. 

I'll be visiting Houma, Louisiana the week where March meets April, so if you live there and want to see me, let me know, and we'll try to make it happen.

Go Saints!!!!!

Monday
25Jan2010

Gun Control Compromise?

I was at the bookstore this weekend, and I noticed a book in the True Crime section titled 'More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws'. I am by no means an expert on the topic of gun control, but I've given it at least five minutes of intense thought, so I'll give my half-cocked (pun intended) opinion.

By nature, I am a libertarian. I believe people should be allowed to do what they want, when they want, as long as it doesn't interfere with another individual's freedom to do the same. Rather simplified, but you get the gist. I fully support any individuals right to own any type of firearm, from pistol to bazooka, but I understand both sides of the gun control argument.

I've read about the city of Kennesaw, GA, which in 1982 unanimously passed a law requiring all heads of household to own at least one firearm. Their crime rates have dropped drastically. The basic premise of 'right to carry' advocates is 'if we take away the right to own a firearm, only the criminals will have firearms'. This argument makes sense, in theory. However, I think this solution and example will only work in a small town like Kennesaw.

Here's my problem, on a practical level: I'm not a gun guy. If the laws on gun ownership became less strict, I still wouldn't purchase a firearm. It's just not my thing. Most people who live in cities or suburbs (with a few exceptions I'm sure) feel the same way. That's why most gun control advocates reside in major metropolises. Most people who haven't handled a firearm can't imagine handling a firearm. 

Assuming the majority people in cities who want guns are criminals, it makes sense to have stricter gun laws in major cities. Leave the small towns the ability to adopt less strict laws, which fit with the community cultural standards. It seems to me that stricter laws in cities will reduce crime (using the UK as an example), while lax laws in small towns would reduce crime (Kennesaw being the model here).

Although I fully support a person's right to own a firearm, it seems that it is a complicated and intense topic for the majority of Americans. Because of this, I suggest a compromise. Thoughts?

If you enjoyed reading this post, please subscribe to the RSS feed or take a minute to share it with someone else. 

Saturday
23Jan2010

Lactose Intolerant

And I thought I was lactose intolerant..LOL

(Click on image for fullsize version)

If you enjoyed reading this post, please subscribe to the RSS feed or take a minute to share it with someone else. 

Thursday
21Jan2010

'The Bachelor' Double Standard

It's funny to realize high school mentalities still exist in the adult world and are often played out on prime time television. In high school, a guy that sleeps with a lot of girls is often revered by his classmates, sometimes even keeping 'score' of his conquests. If a high school girl does the same thing, and sleeps with multiple guys, she's considered a slut.

I don't watch 'The Bachelor', but I've seen some news reports about a recent incident. The premise of 'The Bachelor' is for a guy to go through a selection of 25 or so women and select the best one to be his bride. This season, one of the female contestants was booted off the show because she either flirted with, kissed, or had sex with a producer. The producer was fired and she was kicked off the show. She was treated with utter contempt by the host, and she was kicked up with a dramatic 'how dare you, you little slut' send-off. This is such a double standard.

The bachelor can flirt, kiss, and sleep with any girl on the show until he finds the right one, yet the girls are expected to remain chaste and focus all of their attention on the one special man. How is this not a double standard? It most certainly is, and it's just a simple continuation of silly high school ways of thinking.

If you enjoyed reading this post, please subscribe to the RSS feed or take a minute to share it with someone else.