Navigation

 



Thursday
Aug262010

Privacy and Why We Need It

'If one would give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest man, I would find something in them to have him hanged'.

-Cardinal Richelieu

I believe Cardinal Richelieu hit the proverbial nail on the head with this quote. Privacy isn't something that should only matter to those living 'rightly'; it is something we should ultimately be concerned with to maintain our freedom. We need privacy to prevent the abuse of power from those in authority.

Eric Schmidt, the CEO of 'all-knowing' Google, recently made some rather disconcerting comments regarding Google, privacy, and the government. Here's a few snippets:

'If you have something that you don't want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place'.

'The only way to manage this is true transparency and no anonymity. In a world of asynchronous threats, it is too dangerous for there not to be some way to identify you. We need a [verified] name service for people. Governments will demand it'.

'Young people may one day have to change their names in order to escape their previous online activity'.

I've heard some comment that Google has enough information in its records (email/documents/search history) to destroy every marriage and create war between nations. Once you begin giving this concept some serious thought, it doesn't seem too far from the truth. Google possesses more data than we probably even realize. 

Cell phones are another issue altogether. Every place a user travels is tracked and recorded with the on-board GPS that comes standard on every phone. Even phones that do not appear to have GPS capabilities possess the same ability to track their users. This feature was initially put into phones for use by the 911 system, but its use has been expanded and modified, as can be expected.

Here's an example of how a seemingly harmless information gathering idea can grow into something intrusive and abusive. Most of us have had the experience of using shopper reward cards, the cards we scan to get discounts at our favorite stores. There are currently people who would like the government to regulate the purchase and consumption of non-healthy foods. These cards track everything you purchase, including all of your food choices. The government could take this information and either tax you heavily for its use, or provide the information to insurance companies who would in turn use the data to charge higher rates to consumers who fit a certain profile. 

Free countries should not spy on their citizens. A country that watches every move of its citizenry is not a free country, it is a police state. We cannot sacrifice freedom for liberty, regardless of the facade of protection it seems to afford us. Even when initial intentions are pure, it is impossible to escape the scope creep of having that much power. 

'Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely'.

Being connected gives one a sense of power; having the entire collective wealth of the world's information at your fingertips can be intoxicating. However, it makes one wonder if that perhaps someday the power dynamic will shift. Can it be that eventually the power will lie with those who have maintained the most privacy? 

Postscript: If you are interested in further information regarding privacy, I recommend the wonderful lecture given by Steve Rambam at this year's HOPE conference titled 'Privacy Is Dead: Get Over It'. Click here for part one's torrent and here for part two's torrent.

If you enjoyed reading this post, please subscribe to the RSS feed or take a minute to share it with someone else via Digg, Reddit, or Stumbleupon.

Monday
Aug162010

Music Monday: The Evolution of Adam Laclave

Adam Laclave is a musical genius, and also one of the coolest people I've ever had the pleasure of meeting.

Rather than bestowing endless accolades, I present to you, 'The Evolution of Adam Laclave'.

Earthsuit

Macrosick

Club of The Sons

Download their whole album for free by clicking here.

Charlie Blacksmoke

This is part of Adam's new experimental project. In this piece, he has added vocal soul stylings over the piano composition of Sakamoto. To experience the full impact of this improvisational masterpiece, first listen to about thirty seconds of Sakamoto's original by clicking here.

I don't have much more to add, other than I find it a shame that he hasn't made more of an impact in the musical world. He is surely on par with the musical talent of David Byrne and I can only believe that he is not famous because the world is not ready for such genius.

If you enjoyed reading this post, please subscribe to the RSS feed or take a minute to share it with someone else.

Wednesday
Aug042010

Book Review: Whip Smart by Melissa Febos

I recently noticed the books that my Kindle is recommending to me. Reading down the list: Belle de Jour: Diary of an Unlikely Call Girl, The 33 Strategies of War, Pill Head: The Secret Life of a Painkiller Addict, and Ugly Americans: The True Story of the Ivy League Cowboys Who Raided the Asian Markets for Millions. Perhaps they're trying to tell me something, or perhaps I should realize they are only recommending books based on what I've previously purchased (or sampled), revealing my interests in all things deviant and diabolical. Don't worry, reading about it typically satisfies my taste in the hedonistic subject matter (wink, wink, nudge, nudge, say no more).

With that said, I just finished reading the delightful memoir of a drug addicted dominatrix by the name of Melissa Febos. I first heard about her book Whip Smart on the tastefully high brow NPR's Fresh Air, and was equally excited when I found out that the author is now a professor at SUNY Purchase College. Why is this exciting? Well, mainly because I'm tired of reading memoirs of people who don't know how to string together a proper sentence. 

Melissa Febos is a strong woman wrought from a strong cloth. She has overcome a lot of trying times in her life, most from her unquenchable curiosity, which I can definitely empathize with. Curiosity can get you in deep and take you much further than you ever intended to go. Febos became addicted to drugs and a dominatrix, basically because she was bored with maintaining a 4.0 average at the university she was attending. 

I personally enjoyed the domination scenes much more than the drug scenes, probably due to my prurient interests in what some consider deviant sexual behavior. I see all human behavior as natural, and see a place for most of it in safe expressions of humanity. Her descriptions of the various requests and desires of her clients were equally parts fascinating and disturbing. The most intriguing part was the way with which the clients perceived their sessions, most as nothing more than therapy or an appointment for massage.

It was in therapy that Febos was able to face the deeper issues that plagued her psyche. My only problem with the entire book was that after a short time, she accepted the therapist's diagnosis without much question. Her therapist saw her participation in the BDSM lifestyle as her desire to feel in control. I don't know her personally, but I got the feeling that all of her issues were simply related to an existential ennui coupled with insatiable curiosity. But, then again, I'm no therapist.

I recommend this book to all those who like to venture beyond the pale of the normal human experience, albeit vicariously. I love to learn about the extremes of the human experience, and this book gave me a front row seat into a world that I'd previously only read about in passing.Whip Smart is an excellent read, well-written and thought provoking in every good way.

If you enjoyed reading this post, please subscribe to the RSS feed or take a minute to share it with someone else.

Thursday
Jul222010

Feminism and Film, or: How the Bechdel Test Has Changed My Life

I am feminist. I support women's rights and believe that despite obvious physical differences, women should be entitled to the same rights and privileges of men. That's a fact. If you're waiting for a 'but', there is none. In fact, if I were to go back in the future and choose a different, equally useless undergraduate path to the wild success I currently experience <sarcasm intended>, I would probably choose to attend Vassar and major in women's studies. 

I love film. I'm not a typical moviegoer, although I appreciate a wide range of movies. I enjoy critical analysis of film and discussions of directors and cinematography. I can talk about movies for hours without showing signs of fatigue. I've considered starting a film blog, writing movie reviews for pay, and/or reviewing lists of 'films you must watch before you die', several times. Film is one of my fascinations in life, even though I admittedly fall asleep on them more than I'd like.

How does feminism relate to film? Over the years we've seen stronger women characters, movie leads, and even more directors rising up in the world of film. I was so happy when Kathryn Bigelow won Best Director for The Hurt Locker. I've been a fan of her work since I first saw Point Break, which I still enjoy when it airs endlessly on Spike. With that said, I've come across a paradigm shifting test that, when applied to movies, shows an obvious bias against women and their role in film (even The Hurt Locker fails).

[Enter Bechdel Test]

The Bechdel Test is a test created and popularized by Alison Bechdel's comic Dykes to Watch Out For. It is a simple test applied to movies that consists of three rules:  

  1. Does the movie have at least two named women in it?
  2. Do they talk to each other?
  3. Do they talk to each other about something other than a man?

I was first introduced to the Bechdel Test from the video below. It has completely blown my mind and changed my perspective on film for the rest of my life.

I'm rather ashamed to say that I've never noticed that the bias against women in movies was this strong. Sure, I knew that there are few women directors and that overall, strong women leads are few and far between. But the Bechdel test doesn't even require that much. It sets the bar extremely low, and yet the vast majority of successful movies fail the test. While I see a lot of posts on Feministing and Feministe (my two favorite feminist blogs) that tend to split hairs when finding things to complain about, the Bechdel Test leaves me speechless.

If you enjoyed reading this post, please subscribe to the RSS feed or take a minute to share it with someone else.

Wednesday
Jul072010

Christians Reconciling With Gays?

When I was in Chi Alpha, I remember taking part in a religious practice that we called two-by-two, or friendship evangelism. In groups of two, we would target individuals on campus who were sitting alone. We would introduce ourselves, typically asking them to take a survey or answer our question of the day. This was our way of breaking the ice and beginning a dialog about beliefs.

It was basically a modified sales pitch for Christianity. Find a reason to start talking, and then shift the conversation to the person's most intimate beliefs and life struggles. Pretend to be a friend. Many times, we'd even convince the person to attend a service, which was like scoring a goal for Jesus.

The potential problem occurred when we actually gained a convert as a result. A few weeks pass by, and then that person would be introduced to the concept of friendship evangelism. 'Wait. You mean you only talked to me because it's part of the system used to gain new followers in your religion?' It always seemed rather cheap to me, a religious bait and switch.

This article was posted by a friend of mine on facebook. It's about Christians who showed up at the Pride Parade wearing shirts that said 'We're Sorry', a demonstration of their guilt at the mistreatment of gays by the Christian church. Don't get me wrong. I think it's great that the Christian church is trying to take a step in the right direction in treating people as Jesus would.

The gay community's response to the shirts was exactly what the Christians wanted. The honey rather than vinegar sales tactic wins more people than spouting hate and hoping they see their wrongs. In fact, some members of the gay community were moved to tears. But what happens once you gain a convert? 

Here's an imaginary future conversation between an 'I'm Sorry' shirt wearing Christian and a recent gay convert, several weeks after their first meeting:

GAY CONVERT (excited): This is so awesome. The Christians have realized that being gay isn't wrong and that God loves us too. This is awesome. I can finally be gay and Christian.

CHRISTIAN: Well, not so fast. Yes, God loves you. But homosexuality is still wrong. You can't still be gay and Christian. Well, you can have the thoughts, but can't really participate in the actions. That's wrong.

GAY CONVERT(confused): Well, what's the shirts and the new acceptance all about? Is it just another sham?

CHRISTIAN: Well, not really. We're sorry for the 'God Hates Fags' people and we want to show you God's love, but that doesn't change that a sin is a sin is a sin.

GAY CONVERT: So, I still can't be gay and Christian? Why didn't you tell me this in the first place? 

CHRISTIAN: ...

I know that the Christians who are doing this are the best kind of Christians and are well-meaning in their actions. I'm just curious what's going to happen when the gay people they attract start asking questions. Do they really think and believe that getting them saved will solve everything and change their base nature? I imagine the Christian response to be something like this: 'We don't stop shoplifters from shoplifting once they become Christians. We just point them to Christ and let him do that work. We don't try to change liars. We just let God change them'. 

What's the problem with this? Well, it's the fact that on one hand, they're being accepting of the person, but they are still calling them out for being degenerate sinners. You're bringing them in under false pretenses. The gay people don't realize they're not getting the full story.

Aren't we all sinners? This is how it'll be disguised. We all have our issues. Some may be lying, others may be homosexuality. The problem is that the gays want to be accepted for who they are, which is gay. They don't want to become a non-gay version of themselves. 

This isn't true acceptance of the gay community, it's just another bait and switch sales tactic for Christianity. 

If you enjoyed reading this post, please subscribe to the RSS feed or take a minute to share it with someone else.